'Film Adaptation Les Miserables by Victor Hugo Essay\r'

'Non-Consequentialist theories of chasteity be best convey by the character quizzer Javert. His actions argon lead by the theory that it is ruin to lead a life where radiation patterns be followed. It is your art to obey the fairnesss and it is your duty to everlastingly act in this valet de chambrener. Consequences be non to be considered when judging a persons actions (Thiroux, Krase piece of musicn, 2012, p. 46). Inspector Javert’s position in inn supports his actions. This man mustiness follow the constabularys passel by his government, and lead his community by example. His duty was to carry egress the fair play which atomic number 18 examples of regularisation absolutes which hug drug no room for exceptions (Thiroux, Krasemann, 2012, p. 87). The Inspector move arounds obsessed with the prehend of blue jean ValJean, a criminal who must be caught and brought to justice. The dash begins with the story of a man, Jean ValJean, who is graduation exe rcise introduced to the viewer in a prison house setting, where new-fashionedr you divulge out he was imprisoned for theft.\r\n subsequently serving nine-teen years of punishment in prison for his crime he is hence honoured electric outlet on parole. Following his release he adjoins a nonher(prenominal) business office where he acts in contrast to those beliefs of a rule functional bid Javert. These contrasting characters atomic number 18 examples within their direct principles. Non-Consequentialist Theories are ground on the persuasion that consequences are non and in fact should not be a factor in find out whether the act is moral or fast (Thiroux, Krasemann, 2012, p. 46). Where as consequentialism is based or c at one timerned with consequences. Jean ValJean’s guiding principles are more of an act utilitarian who believes that e actu entirelyyone should act that act which will run out the greatest safe over bounteous for everyone have-to doe withed b y the act (Thiroux, Krasemann, 2012, p. 37). Utilitarianism is a form of Consequentialism. Javert is a rule utilitarian where his humors are that everyone should always follow the rule or rules that will fuck off greater good. These papers are contrasting because it is unsure what actions would bring greater good with or without fashioning exceptions to the rules at hand.\r\nJavert being an official of the rightfulness encourages the importance of law within the sprout to avoid loosing control within his community. On one hand ValJean broke the law only to avoid the death of starvation. These situations are the basis of the conflicting approaches to morality by each main character in the film. ValJean encounters the Character of Bishop Myriel who offers him a job and teats him genial despite his criminal background. The Bishop is a haughty influence on ValJean. While work for the Bishop, he muddles a covenant to become a die man and give birth himself only after being c aught one time again for stealing silverware from the bishop. The Bishop lies to officers only to render ValJean from re offering to prison. With the silver that was stolen and now a gift was he only capable to accomplish his promise for a better life. ValJeans commitment guide him to later became the owner of a factory and the Mayor of his city. at that place we are first introduced to the character of Fantine.\r\nWe pause that she has a child, Cossette, who is in care with another family The Thenardiers. Fantine works hard to provide for Cossette at the factory where she is later fired from, which led to her desperate need to make money. awful times cause for desperate measures., like Fantine prostituting to as a mean to make money. Fantine’s unlawful actions lead her to encounter the Inspector Javert. present is where the feuding theories of morality amongst Javert and ValJean are at one time brought to question once again. Should Fantines actions be justified by the idea that prostitution is wrong and unlawful, or is it pass because she must provide for Cossette and her needs? In the end the Mayors position allows Fantine to avoid prison time thus pitch astir(predi quate) greatness for her family. His utilitarian approach to the situation causes more conflict with the Inspector who believes she should be inprisoned for suspension the law.\r\nMore evidence with the ain moral theories conflicting are unvarnished when Jean ValJean promises Fantine that he will bow out care of her daughter Cossette. He first must escape from Mr. Jovert who is now awake that he is a convict. Javert expressed the idea that a law breaker cannot rejuvenate therefore ValJean should not be Mayor. Javert commented on his parents excessively being criminals when he was a child. Once exposed ValJean escapes once again with Cossette to capital of France, where they live in a convent. He feels it is his duty to carry out his promise of a better life. Reparat ion (prima facie) is a duty mentioned when looking at non-consequential theories (Thiroux, Krasemann, 2012, p. 54). Cossette and ValJean are able to achieve a accomplish life with shelter in the city of capital of France period at the convent. Cossette in conclusion asks to not become a nun and persuades ValJean to live outside the convent. Willing to delight Cossette, ValJean agrees to the move.\r\nCossette attracts an admirer while exploring her new environs in the character Marius. Marius is a fresh revolutionary who asks to â€Å"Restore the Republic”. He becomes obsessed and determined to interact with Cossette, very much like he is move to his revolution. Inspector Javert as well resides in Paris where he is the newest Deputy as the reward from exposing the truth intimately Jean ValJean. The â€Å"cat and mouse game” between Jean ValJean and the Inspector Javert is continued in Paris when he is informed with information about the revolutionists new j azz interested Cossette. Marius was followed by one of ValJeans informant following the revolutionists. Javert is once again on the hot out of bounds to bring ValJean to an end. He is determined to bring justice because it is the remedy thing for him to do. ValJean unconscious(predicate) of Cossettes relationship with her young suitor opens an fortune for the Inspector to get close and in conclusion cease the former convict. ValJean now a â€Å"reformed man” refuses to give up without a fight. In the attempt to flee once again ValJean is encountered with the dilemma of Marius and Cossette’s relationship.\r\nHer relationship is troubled by the change magnitude resistance from the revolutionists against the Parisian army. With the city blockaded ValJean must return Marius safely to Cossette. In pursuit for Marius the army injures Cossette’s love and now ValJean must flee the crazy house of the city with the injured Marius. Not sooner once again encounteri ng the persistant Javert. This is a turn of flatts that gives ValJean to turn on his predator and cut down him. This doesn’t happen because ValJean is said to give way been merciful towards the Inspector. In the end of this recital the Inspector is surprised by the benignity ValJean showed towards him. The Inspector allowed the convict to aid the Marius to approximately medical attention and return to his capturer. ValJean also agreed to be turned into the Parisian officials after saving Marius. With Marius alive he would no longer have to problem about his Cossettte. Therefore fulfilling his commitment to Fantine. Upon locomote Mr. Javert expressed how his guiding principles to perform his duty the right way brought him confusion when ValJean showed him pity in the situation of life and death.\r\n finis was the only solution the Inspector had in store to this for this ending. Everything ValJean did was justified when the Inspector unyielding to kill himself. The In spector never breaking the law himself saw that there were flaws to his guiding principles and could not live with himself no more. indisposed to face the consequences he saw suitable to end his life thus granting ValJean his freedom. He felt his obsession for the capture of the ValJean would study no end and haunt him forever. At this point he acknowledges the fact that ValJean is a reformed man and not an â€Å" beast” thought to have been created while in the prison system. Before ValJean was a â€Å" fractious problem” to the Inspector himself and he ask bring justice to those acts of the former Mayor. usual we are faced with the same if not different situations where we are asked to do the â€Å"right thing”.\r\nThis is very difficult even to those who appeal to be morally or ethically correct. Rules can be to universal and only act as a guide to do the greatest of good while avoiding consequences. It is also difficult in the sense that there acts or rules offer no exceptions. The story of Les Miserables proves otherwise. ValJean overcame many difficulties and while his actions may have been unlawful they did affect those around him positively. His actions in the end brought him security and loving relationship with his â€Å"daughter”, Cossette, all while ultimately keeping his promis to the Bishop Myriel and the late Fantine. His actions passim the film prove that he is indeed a good man despite his criminal background. ValJean accomplishes reformation which seemed unworkable to the characteristics of the Inspector.\r\nCiminals should be brought to jusitice, laws are meant to be followed, infra no circumstances can the law be flawed, and no exceptions are to be made. These guiding principles for the Inspector shaped his actions throughout this story. ValJeans actions show that his is a honest, caring, and loving man who is rewarded with freedom. He no longer has the vexation of being caught by the Inspector and also rewarded with love from his â€Å"daughter”, Cossette. In the film ValJean states that â€Å"Love is the only future perfection gives us”.\r\nThe guiding theories to ones ethical and moral dilemmas can be conflicting with those of others. Here we have actions based on the idea of realizing the consequences for your actions first or not persuasion about any consequences and acting on what you feel to be right. Rules should always be followed with no exceptions. The belief that one should not be judged or defined by any action in particularly. Rules are important to a society bringing awareness to consequences by ones actions. It is important to not give up on ourselves because we are all capable of reformation if we sine qua non it.\r\n'