Rhetorical analysis of “Migration on Ice” Essay

Migration, on icing How Globalization Kills Chickens for Their Parts is an article that was written by Malia Wollan, a uniform contributor to that New York Times. The article was originally published in an burden of a magazine called Meatpaper, a magazine devoted to discussing the policies, ethics and early(a) issues that surround meat. Although Ms. Wollan does not have a direct call to act in the article, its argument is that globalization of the meat labor has a lot of ill effects on the people on the receiving end, in addition to its obvious benefit of cheap meat. The article uses the ingratiatory tactics of ethos, logos and pathos throughout in order to return credibility with the reader and direct them to the conclusion that she wants.The author uses Ethos effectively throughout the article. There was obviously a lot of research done somewhat the topic, including personal interviews and statistical analysis. She wants the reader to think the globalization of the meat in dustry is essentially unethical. She writes, In a country where more than 30 pct of the population lives in poverty, cheap protein is both a blessing and a curse. On the one hand, it provides affordable nutrition. On the other, it eliminates livelihoods. I think that this retell appeals to the ethics of the reader and provides them with some form of proof that this practice should change. She alike interviews chicken farmers in Ghana whose lives have been ruined by this importing of chicken, further appealing to the ethical side of the reader. Overall, Ms. Wollan seems to be making a fair request in the article. It appears that she is very knowledgeable about the typeface and that she is a trusted source and isnt trying to mislead the reader.